I have tried a wide variety of exponential notation, logirithms, etc.  Any help to get moving in the right direction would be helpful
in Algebra 1 Answers by

Your answer

Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.

1 Answer

Part of the answer is ∑1/(3^k+√(k+1)) for k=1 to n. If we put k=0, we get 1/(1+1)=1/2 or 0.5. This does not fit in with the first terms. It seems only to apply when k>0.

Take the general term of the series. The fraction can be rationalised: 1/(3^k+√(k+1) * (3^k-√(k+1))/(3^k-√(k+1)). This rationalises to (3^k-√(k+1))/(3^2k-k-1). For k=3 this is  (27-2)/(729-4)=25/725=1/29=1/(27+2). For k=1, rationalisation produces (3-√2)/(9-2)=(3-√2)/7. Note that the denominator is always rational. The first three terms 4+1/5+0.3=4.5. As it happens this can be split into 4 +1/2, where 1/2 is the original summation starting with k=0. The series then becomes:

4+∑1/(3^k+√(k+1)) for k=0 to n; or 4+∑(3^k-√(k+1))/(3^2k-k-1) in rational form (use other form when k=0 to avoid division by zero).

 

by Top Rated User (1.1m points)

Related questions

0 answers
1 answer
asked Mar 19, 2013 in Algebra 2 Answers by anonymous | 653 views
1 answer
asked Apr 27, 2013 in Algebra 2 Answers by anonymous | 2.7k views
1 answer
asked Apr 2, 2012 in Algebra 2 Answers by arod78 Level 1 User (180 points) | 3.7k views
1 answer
1 answer
asked Nov 6, 2014 in Algebra 1 Answers by ashanna123 Level 1 User (120 points) | 1.9k views
0 answers
Welcome to MathHomeworkAnswers.org, where students, teachers and math enthusiasts can ask and answer any math question. Get help and answers to any math problem including algebra, trigonometry, geometry, calculus, trigonometry, fractions, solving expression, simplifying expressions and more. Get answers to math questions. Help is always 100% free!
87,551 questions
99,638 answers
2,417 comments
442,968 users